Given that the outer wall of the
Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the only hole is approximately 16 ft.
in diameter
- how
does a plane over 44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as
shown in the crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon?
Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the Pentagon's
upper floors where the tail section would have hit? Close-ups of
this section are extremely revealing.
“I heard a very loud,
quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile.
It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.” - Lon Rains - editor for Space News (Pentagon eyewitness)
In the aftermath, it was reported by
media sources that a giant 100 ft. crater was plowed into the front lawn
of the Pentagon as the result of a powerful airliner crash? Why does
photographic evidence overwhelmingly show that this was absolutely not the
case? Why no crater? Why no skid marks? Why no burn
marks? Why was the entire world deliberately mislead? Examine
the video and photographic evidence for yourself.
How does a Boeing 757, constructed from
lightweight aluminum, penetrate over 9 ft. of steel reinforced
concrete? Photographs and recently discovered computer animations
help shed light on this unexplained feat of physics.
Contrary to the pictures shown to the
American public, after the fact, why does photographic evidence taken only
a few moments after the Pentagon event show no wreckage on the lawn of the
Pentagon? Where is the plane? Where is the tail, the wings,
the luggage, the seats, the landing gear; the engines? What happened
to the passenger
At the World Trade Center, why did
firefighters, reporters and other on the scene eyewitnesses describe a
demolition-like, pancake collapse of buildings One, Two & Seven?
Hear the outrageous admissions made by the building lease owner recorded
on video, plus shocking new video evidence helps to answer some of these
important questions.
What is the bright flash on the right
side of the Boeing 767, seen just before impact on both the North Tower
& the South Tower, captured on video by 5 separate cameramen including
CNN and ABC? Slow motion analysis reveals startling verification of
this extraordinary event and begs the question, "What is
it?" Find out what former military personnel think this could
be.
Why were there numerous reports
of bombs & explosions going off in and around the WTC before any
buildings had collapsed? Hear & see the testimony of the
reporters, rescue teams and eyewitnesses who tell a different story
of potential demolition charges, unexplained explosions, and
vehicles loaded with explosives as reported on live television the
morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
Why did a FOX News employee, who
witnessed the second tower attack, report seeing no windows on “Flight
175” a commercial United Airlines jetliner? Why did another
eyewitness report that United Airlines Flight 175 was not a
commercial airliner? What kind of plane hit the second tower?
Is there some type of exterior
swelling protruding from the undercarriage of “Flight 175”
? An independently conducted computerized digital analysis
says yes. Where was this "instrument"
attached? How could it have departed from a commercial airport
without being noticed? What purpose did it serve in the
attacks? Full-screen television blow-ups directly from CNN and
other mainstream sources reveal the intricate details of this
strange anomaly.
What people are saying
about 911 In Plane Site:
"Mesmerizing...
Absolutely Brilliant"
Joan Veon - Women's
International Media Group
"Shocking
- Thought provoking - Raises serious questions about the government's
honesty in conducting the 9-11 investigation"
Tom
Flocco -
TomFlocco.com
"Everyone
in America should see this video."
Dick Gregory - DickGregory.com
"Absolutely
awesome. This is the one September 11 video that everyone should
see."
Lou Epton - The
Lou Epton Show
"This
is a MUST see film, especially for show and tell"
Meria Heller - www.Meria.net
"The
911 Film Michael Moore Should Have Made."
David
Icke - DavidIcke.com
