Black Operations

This brings us to a very interesting point in our investigation and begs us to ask some very serious questions. What is mounted to the underbelly of Flight 175? What purpose did it serve in the attacks? How could this plane have departed from a commercial airport without such a large attachment being noticed by maintenance and refueling personnel? Wouldn’t the baggage handlers have noticed it? Surely we can all agree that they would have noticed it - that is, if it had taken off from a commercial airport.

Let’s stop for a moment and ask the question, “Did this plane take off from a commercial airport?” We already have one Fox News employee making the statement that the plane had no passenger windows. What commercial airliner has no passenger windows? The answer, I’m sure we all can agree, is none. We have a Fox News anchor asking the question, “Is it possible that was some sort of cargo plane?”

After a few weeks of searching, we were able to obtain photographs of a military Boeing 767. This plane is being marketed to the U.S. Air Force by Boeing to replace their KC-130 series. The most perplexing aspect of this military craft is that it has no passenger windows and is in fact a refueling tanker aircraft. Is it possible that the plane we all saw crashing into the South tower was a Boeing 767 refueling tanker aircraft? Wouldn’t such a plane take off from a military base?

Upon further examination of the plane that hit the second tower we see nothing out of the ordinary… or do we? When the footage is viewed at full speed, 30 frames per second, we do indeed see nothing out of the ordinary. In spite of this, when we slow the footage down from 100% to roughly 2% we see something completely unexpected. Just as the plane is making contact with the building we see something quite remarkable. Just to the right side of the nosecone we can make out a distinct bright red flash.

Some have speculated that this is simply a reflection of light caused by the sun reflecting on the metal surface of the plane. Then again, we have to take into account the physical properties of what causes a reflection. Reflections can only be seen from one angle. For instance, you can use a mirror to aim a reflection of the sun’s rays and point those rays at a different point in space. This is a direct result of light bouncing off of one surface and being directed at another single point. So, in short, a reflection can only be seen from one particular angle. If you move away from that that position, you no longer see the reflection.

“911 In Plane Site” actually uses a total of 4 different pieces of footage to demonstrate that this is no mere reflection. In fact, in one of the most spectacular illustrations the viewer can actually see the bright red flash being directed back onto the fuselage itself.

There has also been speculation that the flash may be landing lights mounted on the underside of each of the wings on the plane and that these powerful lights are radiating on the surface of the building. This theory sounds plausible at first. However, upon closer inspection of additional video footage, which was shot from an angle under the plane, we have a clear view of the other side of the plane. Is there a flash, reflection, or sparkle of light on the left side of the plane? No, there is not. If we rule out landing lights and glinting reflections, does this bring us any closer to explaining this mystery?

TOWER ONE ANOMALY:
FLASH CONFIRMATION

What we needed now was further confirmation that something out of the ordinary was taking place. So now we turn to the North tower, the first building struck by an airliner. When we slowed down this footage, did we see anything out of the ordinary? Indeed we did. There is a massive momentary flash, which occurs just a split second before the plane strikes the outer skin of the building. In this case the flash appears to be a giant solid blast of white smoke.

Ones first impression of this phenomenon might be that it is simply the outer wall of the tower being pulverized into a giant plume of dust and debris. This theory sounds plausible until you play the video backwards in slow motion. It then becomes overwhelmingly apparent that the plane is clear of the building before the blast takes place. We clearly have confirmation of not just one mysterious flash, but two.

What does this all mean? Simply put, there were more things going on the morning of September 11, 2001, than the American public has been led to believe. It is not necessarily our intention to answer all of the questions raised in this documentary, but simply to ask the questions. It is up to the viewing audience to decide if the video and photographic evidence that they are viewing with their own eyes warrants further investigation. If you are like most people who have seen this video, you will no doubt be stricken with an overpowering sense of betrayal. Serious questions need to be addressed by those officials to whom we have entrusted the very survival of this great country.

There can be no doubt; video footage and still photographs need no voice because they speak for themselves. They are incontrovertible evidence of a massive cover-up concerning the events of 9/11. Action is needed and action must be taken – at the polls, in the voting booths, on the street corners, and in your very own living rooms. Spread the word. Spread the video.

To those innumerable individuals who all ask the same drumming question, “What happened to the people onboard those jetliners?” Keep this one simple idea in mind. If you have an unlimited black ops budget, you can make people say anything, do anything, and go anywhere – and no one said choice was an option.

If you still believe that terrorists with box cutters carried out 9/11, then you may have nothing to worry about, but the next time you hear on your local news station that the terrorist threat level has just been elevated, remember the words of Dave vonKleist as he closes this video presentation. “Where is your line in the sand?”