|
|
911 RIPPLE EFFECT Lies, Propaganda and A Call For Justice - “An absolute must see!” - Alex James
 Censorship or Cover-Up? William Rodriguez, World Trade Center survivor and eyewitness, attempted to perform his civic duty by contacting the FBI with what he witnessed on September 11. He tells of a massive explosion in the sub-basement that threw him and his fleeing companions upwards! Rodriguez and 13 other eyewitnesses assert that the explosion took place before Flight 11 struck the upper floors. The
failure
of the 9/11 Commission 
 Flight Data Recorder Disputes Official Flight Path of Flight #77 If we examine the direction that Flight 77 took on its approach to the Pentagon, it immediately becomes clear that the flight path is slightly different from that of the official report. This may seem insignificant at first, but how do we account for light poles that were knocked down even though they were not directly in the path of Flight 77? On further examination of the altitude data, it quickly becomes evident that at the moment of impact with the first four downed light poles, Flight 77's altitude was too high - over 230 ft. If the plane in question did not hit these light poles, what actually brought them down?  Pentagon official account called into question by FEMA photos Why were America and the world never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole. Many people do not realize that the outer wall did not collapse until almost 30 minutes after the initial impact. Examine these astonishing photographs and video footage for the first time. Given that the outer wall of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the only hole is approximately 16 ft. in diameter - how does a jetliner over 44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as shown in the crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon? Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the Pentagon's upper floors where the tail section would have hit?
 Extra equipment attached to Flight 175? Examine the evidence and decide for yourself In captured images, both video and photographs, of U.A. Flight #175, there appears to be some type of “external piece of equipment” attached to the underbelly, as well as a bright anomalous flash preceding the crash. Verified by four separate sources, “Ripple Effect” shares interviews with former military, pilots and other independent researchers asking questions and conducting an extensive analysis of this massive three-dimensional “appendage."
 Their stories changed, but we have the original clips... Jamie McIntyre reported, live, that he saw no large pieces of a plane anywhere at the site, yet, last year he said he was there and photographed pieces of the plane. “Ripple Effect” puts forth the evidence for your discernment, as well as other inconsistencies surrounding the events at the Pentagon.
 Flight 93 A closer look at the Shanksville, PA crash of Flight 93 calls attention to discrepancies in the official account. Phil Jayhan and Jim Fetzer take the lead in this critical look at video and photographic evidence.
Written by William Lewis & Dave vonKleist
|
|
|
|
|
|
